• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

2016 Clark Library Satisfaction Survey

  • Home
  • Undergraduate Students
    • Value of Library Materials
    • Confidence in Performing Research-Related Activities
    • Preferred Method of Receiving Library Assistance
    • Usefulness of Reference/Instruction Support
    • Librarian Assistance / Paper Quality
    • Satisfaction with Library Physical Environment
    • Satisfaction with Library Staff and Services
    • Satisfaction with Digital Lab
    • Preferred Method of Receiving Library Updates
  • Faculty
    • Value of Library Materials
    • Usefulness of Library Reference Services
    • Contribution to Academic Work
    • Undergraduate Research Ability
    • Graduate Research Ability
    • Satisfaction with Staff and Services
    • Satisfaction with Digital Lab
    • Preferred Method of Receiving Updates
  • On-Campus Graduate Students
    • Value of Library Materials
    • Confidence in Performing Research-Related Activities
    • Librarian Assistance / Paper Quality
    • Preferred Mode for Receiving Assistance
    • Usefulness of Reference/Instructional Support
    • Satisfaction with Library Physical Environment
    • Satisfaction with Library Staff and Services
    • Satisfaction with Digital Lab
    • Preferred Method of Receiving Library Updates
  • Off-Campus Graduate Students
    • Value of Library Materials
    • Confidence in Performing Research-Related Activities
    • Preferred Method for Receiving Library Assistance
    • Usefulness of Reference/Instructional Support
    • Satisfaction with Library Staff and Services
    • Preferred Method of Receiving Library Updates
  • Staff
    • Value of Library Materials
    • Usefulness of Reference/Instructional Support
    • Contribution of Library Resources
    • Satisfaction with Library Staff and Resources
    • Satisfaction with Digital Lab
    • Preferred Method of Receiving Updates

Usefulness of Library Reference Services – Faculty

We asked faculty to rate the usefulness of various library services: librarian reference assistance, instant messaging, subject guides, etc. and calculated ratings after excluding those who don’t use the service. As in the 2011 survey, reference assistance received the largest number of “Very Useful” responses.

Some services saw a large increase in faculty rating them useful; for example 23.3% of 2011 faculty said that our instant messaging / Library Chat service was useful, and in 2016 the percentage grew to 62.7%. Subject guides, tutorials and handouts, and RefWorks all received around 20% higher ratings than 5 years ago.

The Library Toolbar and Pilot Scholars received low ratings but are worth getting to know; the Toolbar increases faculty productivity while Pilot Scholars increases the visibility of faculty research.

Compare responses to this question:
Staff | Undergraduates | Off-Campus Graduates | On-Campus Graduates

[su_table]

Very + Somewhat Useful Not Useful+ Somewhat Not Useful Select Thumbnail to View Chart
Reference assistance 87.6% 3.1%
Library subject and course guides 75.1% 8.8% Usefulness of library resources_course guides (Faculty)
RefWorks (Citation management software) 68.3% 13.4% Usefulness of library resources_RefWorks (Faculty)
Online library tutorials and handouts 61.8% 12.3% Usefulness of library resources_online videos (Faculty)
Library chat service 62.7% 17.3% Usefulness of library resources_library chat (Faculty)
LibX Library Toolbar browser plugin 45.2% 28.6% Usefulness of library resources_LibX (Faculty)
Pilot Scholars 40.5% 31.1% Usefulness of library resources_Pilot Scholars (Faculty)

[/su_table]

Primary Sidebar

About

Questions? Contact Heidi Senior, senior@up.edu

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro with Full Header On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in