A few days ago, a faculty member I’m working with expressed her concern about producing online training materials that were just as boring and uncreative as a lot of the training she’d already seen especially webinars of people reading power points. She felt a sense of inevitability as if anything online and instructional was synonymous with dull and dreadful. But even though it’s easy enough to produce something that isn’t particularly engaging, we don’t have to keep doing it. There is a better way. We can make something better.
TED talks are extremely popular with audiences of all ages. Why? It’s because they’re extremely watchable. Even when the speaker isn’t saying anything substantial at all we still watch because the stage presentation is so captivating. The singular human form framed by the dark expanse of the huge stage. The dramatic delivery. The well timed pauses. The supplemental imagery. Add these things up and the speaker might as well be talking about something nonsensical (as she is in this “What is the Biggest Rock” parody video from The Onion) and it wouldn’t make a difference. We would still watch. TED talks are extremely popular with audiences of all ages. Why? It’s because they’re extremely watchable. Even when the speaker isn’t saying anything substantial at all we still watch because the stage presentation is so captivating. The singular human form framed by the dark expanse of the huge stage. The dramatic delivery. The well timed pauses. The supplemental imagery. Add these things up and the speaker might as well be talking about something nonsensical (as she is in this “What is the Biggest Rock?” parody video from The Onion) and it wouldn’t make a difference. We would still watch.
Contrast that with the often painful content delivery vehicles that we foist on our online students. Look at what we do to them on a regular basis! There’s the “Why did they put me in the studio, I have no idea what to do here” presentation of this many instructors (not mentioning names here).
Or the “I’m Still Here, but I’m really really small now” screencast from many screencasts you’ve seen and probably produced yourself.
I’m not singling out any presenters in particular. This sort of thing is happening all over the place and in most cases, it’s something that can often be prevented by the instructional designers and instructional technologists who work directly with faculty. I’m sure most of us in the field have done these types of things before if we’re not still doing them now. From the looks of what’s on Coursera and many of the other MOOC platforms, this is still the norm in online learning.
But why not take a page from the top?
Michael Sandel’s “Justice” course lectures make incredibly compelling viewing even when they’re over the 30 minute mark. One of the reasons, other than the fascinating content, is the setting of the lectures in beautiful Sanders Theater in Cambridge, MA. The old wood charm, the spellbound audience, the simple podium all speak very strong body language before Sandel even utters the first word. You’re in a privileged position, in the company of giants, waiting to receive words of wisdom from a great mind. Even though millions across the world can experience exactly what you’re experiencing, it still feels very selective and rare. It makes you want to “be” there, even if “being” means being in front of your phone.
Notice how the camera work and editing underscore the instructional content and support the viewer’s learning. And notice all the TED parallels? When Sandel is framed against the dark backdrop, we hang on his every word because his presence is so pronounced that we simply can’t focus anywhere else. When the camera pans the audience, we see such intensive concentration that we automatically pay attention more closely too. The audio quality is superb as well. This is what we should be aiming for.
While most of us don’t have anything like the majestic Sanders Theater to film our instructional media in, surely, we’ve got better settings than poorly lit, crammed offices piled high with books, papers, and coffee mugs. Best case scenario is having a fully functional studio to use. But if that’s not possible, finding a few nice spots on campus goes a long way towards making something watchable. Having a decent green screen set up comes in handy and fits into even very tight budgets. Even on a shoestring budget, we don’t need to keep churning out stuff that is work to watch.
To recap:
WATCHABILITY is a THING: Make sure what you expect students to watch is watchable! Good production values matter.
CHOOSE WISELY: In many cases an audio file is a better way to communicate information than screencasts of slide decks that don’t have much visual appeal
THE MEDIUM SHOULD SUPPORT THE MESSAGE: Use videography and editing to frame the content and underscore important points. Make sure camerawork and editing support learning rather than hinder it.





